Education and Career related important and useful tips for students, Information about various Courses, recruitment news and more.

Why SpaceX’s Starship Will Fall Like Skydiver And Not Fly Like An Airplane

Elon Musk introduced to Yuusaku Miyazawa from Japan as SpaceX's first privately funded passenger. The destination is a quick flight around the moon on SpaceX's enormous next-generation spaceship the BFS or Big Falcon spaceship that's the upper stage portion of the BFR the Big Falcon Rocket. Let us look back at all the little clues and past presentations tweets and Retta AMAs there's actually a lot of information out there that will help us understand just how exactly the BFS will re-enter and land.

Ever since SpaceX tweeted a photo on September 13th, 2018. A lot of people fear the BFR is slowly turning into the Space Shuttle. Quoting ever growing wings and a giant heat shield covering the belly of the ship. So how is this any different than the space shuttle. So first up to compare the two, let's look at them side-by-side.

The space shuttle’s body and Delta wings provided lift then kept the vehicle in the upper atmosphere longer, leading off speeds slowly so as not to overheat the silicon tile heat shield. Then the wings and control surfaces were used to glide albeit very steeply to the runway to make a horizontal landing like an airplane. Now on the BFS instead of having the fins and body of the vehicle generate lift, it's trying to create as much drag as possible using the entire broad side of the vehicle to aerobrake. Its purpose is basically to scrub off as much speed as possible very quickly.

Related Article: SpaceX Will Send Two & Stainless Steel Starships & To Mars On 2020

When the Space Shuttle reentered had a 40-degree angle of attack that's quite a bit different from the BFS which is going to have about a 90-degree angle of attack. The reason the BFS will be able to do this is because of those wings. Now really these aren't wings and we shouldn't call them that. We need to think of these more as air brakes. As they are not there to provide lift, they're only there to provide more or less drag.

Now they do this by changing their angle just like an air brake and by adjusting the amount of drag at the top or the bottom of the BFS, they can change the pitch. So you might think isn't this kind of similar to a Virgin Galactic control spaceship twos reentry which has that giant tail that flips up that allows it to re-enter safely or perhaps you're a history buff and you're familiar with the Soviet Union's MIG 105 spiral or later the Bor-4 which have a variable dihedral wing which changes their angle of attack during descent.

Although these vehicles do have variable surfaces to change their orientation. They aren't really dynamic, they move only to provide different configurations. Either a more stable reentry profile or then they change to provide more lift and control for the landing phase. They don't actively go back and forth to continually adjust the vehicle's orientation.

Maybe the best example of a vehicle that actually changes its orientation by changing drag would be the B-2 stealth bomber the B-2 bomber actively changes its yaw by utilizing a split aileron to create a drag on the left or the right wing.

Related Article: How Will SpaceX Send Human To Mars And Reduce Cost Of Space Travel? How Does Falcon 9 Work?

By deploying what's essentially an air brake on one wing or the other the drag will actually steer and orient the vehicle. This is honestly about the closest example to a vehicle that changes drag to modify its orientation in this manner. When you factor in that belly-first reentry this dynamic drag control is one of the reasons why the BFS is more like a skydiver than an airplane. A skydiver controls their orientation by shifting the amount of drag each limb generates.

Besides those Finn wingy things and some massive control thrusters another key piece that will allow the BFS to do a full-blown belly flop through the atmosphere is the heat shield. The Space Shuttle used over 24,000 individual and unique silica tiles to cover the belly of the shuttle. The size of the wings and the amount of lift the shuttle needed to achieve in the upper atmosphere was largely due to making sure the shuttle didn't overheat the silica tiles. Overwhelming them would transfer the heat from the tiles to the fuselage of the orbiter.

The BFS, on the other hand, will use something very similar to what SpaceX uses on their dragon capsules. This is an ablative material known as PICA-X or if you don't like acronyms and prefer cool sounding words phenolic impregnated carbon ablator.

Ablative heat shields are the ones that purposefully flake off material as it heats up which then takes some of the heat with it. SpaceX has had great luck with the heat shields on their Dragon capsule and although they could probably reuse heat shield about ten times before needing to be refurbished.

Related Article: Why Elon Musk Chose Stainless Steel To Build SpaceX's Starship

SpaceX continues to advance their PICA-X and they hope to get to the point where it can be used a hundred times before needing to be replaced. PICA-X can handle much higher temperatures than the shuttle tiles which is necessary when trying to re-enter from Mars or the moon.

Not to mention with a really steep reentry profile one that tries to slow down as quickly as possible the heat shield will be pushed to the limits. So if the BFS will have an ablative heat shield that needs to be replaced isn't that an even worse refurbishment process than the Space Shuttle which had thousands and thousands of hours of checks to ensure that their tiles were okay for every single reef light.

When it comes to mounting the heat shield to the BFS according to Elon, " the heat shield place will be mounted directly to the primary tank wall that's the most mass-efficient way to go don't want to build a box in a box."

Unlike the space shuttle, a good amount of the fuselage is uniform just a giant nine-meter tube. So there could be some really common plates that are easy to mount, replace and manufacture. But as the nose tapers or where there are unique areas like the fins there will need to be more specialized heat shields in those areas.

Just like how making hundreds of Merlin engines is cheaper than building dozens of rocket engines from a manufacturing standpoint having a common heat shield plate. That's easily mountable and replaceable, should help alleviate some of the headaches the Space Shuttle experienced in its refurbishment process.

Not to mention the Space Shuttle tiles were extremely fragile they could follow if you just looked at them wrong and it was very important to make sure that every single one was literally perfect before each flight. A more traditional heat shield is a lot more resilient in the sense.

Beyond the fact that it does look like the BFS is beginning to evolve more and more into the space shuttle the way, it performs reentry is completely different using different techniques, different technologies, different materials and an entirely different reentry profile.

I think it's really unfair to say it's similar to the space shuttle than the fins on the back to make it look like Tintin's rocket or the Planet Express ship from Futurama. But don't forget those fins are also the landing legs and this makes it look more like the TWA moon liner originally featured at Disneyland Tomorrowland in 1955. It's clever to take advantage of the landing gear and make it function as a control surface that's something was technically possible on the Falcon 9's landing.

You Might Also Like:

Add Comment Hide

Educationaltechs

Education and Career related important and useful tips for students, Information about various Courses, recruitment news and more.

Submit Your Email To Get Update Of Our Latest Articles Directly In Your Inbox

NEWSLETTER SIGNUP

© 2017 Educationaltechs Proudly powered by Blogger